| Vargas v Crown Container Co., Inc. |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 08298 |
| Decided on November 22, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
2016-02157
(Index No. 12520/08)
v
Crown Container Co., Inc., et al., defendants, Advanced Fleet Maintenance, Inc., appellant (and third-party actions).
Nelson Levine De Luca & Horst LLC (Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury, NY [Matthew W. Naparty and Gregory A. Cascino], of counsel), for appellant.
The Edelsteins, Faegenburg & Brown, New York, NY (Paul J. Edelstein of counsel), for respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the defendant Advanced Fleet Maintenance, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schack, J.), dated November 30, 2015, which granted the plaintiffs' motion, in effect, for a determination that Insurance Law § 3420(a)(2) permits recovery against it or its insurer, nonparty Century Surety Company, of statutory interest payable on the final judgment in the action from the date of the decedent's death.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs' motion, in effect, for a determination that Insurance Law § 3420(a)(2) permits recovery against the defendant Advanced Fleet Maintenance, Inc., or its insurer, nonparty Century Surety Company, of statutory interest payable on the final judgment in the action from the date of the decedent's death is denied.
The plaintiffs' decedent was employed as a helper on a private garbage truck and sustained fatal injuries when the truck lurched backward and pinned him against a garbage dumpster. The plaintiffs, the administrator of the decedent's estate and the decedent's infant son, by his mother and natural guardian, commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death against, among others, the defendant Advanced Fleet Maintenance, Inc. (hereinafter Advanced), which serviced the truck's transmission prior to the accident. Following a trial, the jury found that Advanced was 49.5% at fault in the happening of the accident and awarded damages to the plaintiffs. A judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against Advanced in the principal sum of $3,603,394, with statutory interest accruing from the date of the verdict. Advanced appealed from the judgment (see Vargas v Crown Container Co., Inc., ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2014-05737; decided herewith]).
Subsequently, the plaintiffs moved, in effect, for a determination that Insurance Law § 3420(a)(2) permits recovery against Advanced or its insurer, nonparty Century Surety Company, [*2]of statutory interest payable on the judgment from the date of the decedent's death. The Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs' motion, and Advanced appeals.
Insurance Law § 3420(a)(2) permits a plaintiff to commence an action against an insurer for the policy limits in the event that a judgment which has not been stayed remains unsatisfied for 30 days. This provision does not apply to this case because Advanced's insurer is not a party to the action (see Batista v Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y., 135 AD3d 797; Alejandro v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 84 AD3d 1132), and the parties stipulated that the plaintiffs would not seek to execute the judgment or collect the judgment from the insurer until all appeals were exhausted. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion should have been denied.
DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, HINDS-RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court