Fletcher v. Sprool

mm~mmm.wm.»..¢m » . v. 1 4,. . <\ ,M.W... w ~Ww

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED

DEBORAH D. FLETCHER )
) mm uDEC 4 2017
Plaintiff, ) Cou -S. Dlstrlct
mw &Bankru
) the Dlstrlct of co,u:'tb'a
v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2283 (UNA)
)
EDIE SPROOL, )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiffs application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application Will be granted but the

complaint Will be dismissed

The Court has reviewed plaintiff s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by
pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted
by lawyers See Haines v. Kerner, 4()4 U.S. 5l9, 520 (l972). Even pro se litigants, however,
must comply With the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 23 7, 239
(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint
contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon Which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a
short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand
for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a). The purpose of the minimum
standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted, sufficient
to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine Whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

*~…¢M~H .. ., . . m \.. … ~, »» , _ W-