| Flanders v Sedgwick Ave. Assoc., LLC |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 08718 |
| Decided on December 14, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 14, 2017
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick, Webber, JJ.
5153 301886/13
v
Sedgwick Avenue Associates, LLC, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Mallilo & Grossman, Flushing (John S. Manessis of counsel), for appellant.
Law Office of Beth S. Gereg, Smithtown (Beth S. Gereg of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered December 1, 2016, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
Owner defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that they lacked actual or constructive notice of the defect in the sidewalk that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall (see Uncyk v Cedarhurst Prop. Mgt., LLC, 137 AD3d 610, 610 [1st Dept 2016]). A jury could infer from plaintiff's photograph of the defective condition that the condition existed for a sufficient length of time for owner defendants to have discovered it and had time to repair it (see Taylor v New York City Tr. Auth., 48 NY2d 903, 904 [1979]).
In opposition, plaintiff raised an issue of fact as to whether the defect was actionable and not trivial. A photograph of the sidewalk at the time of plaintiff's accident showed the condition of the sidewalk to be well-worn, with cracks between the slabs, and the defect shown in close-up appeared to be capable of causing plaintiff to trip and fall (see Dominguez v OCG, IV, LLC, 82 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2011]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 14, 2017
CLERK