IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JAMES B. ELEY, §
§ No. 218, 2017
Defendant Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court of the
§ State of Delaware
v. §
§ Cr. ID No. 0908008289 (S)
STATE OF DELAWARE, §
§
Plaintiff Below, §
Appellee. §
Submitted: October 13, 2017
Decided: December 21, 2017
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
This 21st day of December 2017, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and
the Superior Court record, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant, James B. Eley, filed this appeal from the sentence
imposed on his second violation of probation (“VOP”). We find no merit to the
appeal and affirm the Superior Court’s judgment.
(2) On November 17, 2009, Eley pleaded guilty to criminal offenses and
was sentenced to a total of thirteen years of Level V incarceration suspended after
five years for six months of Level IV Home Confinement followed by five years of
concurrent Level III probation. Eley was adjudged guilty of VOP in January 2016
and was sentenced, on February 18, 2016, to a total of four years and ten months of
Level V incarceration suspended after two years and ten months for six months of
Level IV Home Confinement and two years of concurrent Level III probation.
(3) Following his April 27, 2017 guilty plea to a new offense, Eley was
found guilty of VOP and sentenced.1 For the new offense, Eley was declared a
habitual offender and sentenced to two years of Level V incarceration. For the VOP,
Eley was sentenced to a total of four years and ten months of Level V incarceration
suspended for 120 days of Level IV Work Release and one year of Level III
probation. This appeal followed.
(4) On appeal from the sentence imposed on his second VOP, Eley asserts
that he has twice served the six months of Level IV Home Confinement that was
originally imposed in 2009 and re-imposed in 2016 on his first VOP. Eley argues
that he should not have to serve any more time at Level IV and that, to the extent the
April 27, 2017 sentence imposed 120 days of Level IV Work Release on his second
VOP, the sentence is illegal. His claim is without merit.
(5) Once a VOP is established, the Superior Court is authorized to impose
up to the balance of Level V incarceration remaining on the original sentence, or any
lesser sentence, as long as the defendant is given credit for all Level V time
previously served and the sentence does not exceed the Level V term that a prior
1
State v. Eley, Del. Super., Cr. ID No. 1704008122.
2
sentence left suspended.2 Only time spent at Level V or a Level IV VOP Center is
creditable against a VOP sentence.3 In Eley’s case, the VOP sentence imposed on
April 27, 2017, including the 120 days of Level IV Work Release, did not exceed
the maximum sentence allowed by law. Eley was not entitled to credit for any time
he served at Level IV Home Confinement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura
Justice
2
11 Del. C. § 4334(c) (Supp. 2017); State v. Sloman, 886 A.2d 1257, 1260 (Del. 2005); Gamble
v. State, 728 A.2d 1171, 1172 (Del. 1999).
3
Gamble v. State, 728 A.2d at 1172.
3