| Bersin Props., LLC v County of Monroe Indus. Dev. Agency |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 09055 |
| Decided on December 22, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
1464 CA 17-00512
v
COUNTY OF MONROE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, COUNTY OF MONROE, EAST IRONDEQUOIT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (ANDREW R. DUNLAP OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (PHILIP G. SPELLANE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS COUNTY OF MONROE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND COUNTY OF MONROE.
FERRARA FIORENZA PC, EAST SYRACUSE (CHARLES E. SYMONS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT EAST IRONDEQUOIT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered June 3, 2016. The order and judgment, inter alia, granted the motion of defendants County of Monroe Industrial Development Agency and County of Monroe for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them and for partial summary judgment with respect to the first and second counterclaims.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 22, 2017
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court