United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 16, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-50890
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LAVERN A. SMITH,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:04-CR-228-ALL
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lavern Smith challenges the sufficiency of the evidence
supporting her conviction. Smith was convicted under the
Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13, for being intoxicated
while operating a motor vehicle in a public place within the
confines of Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Texas.
We review the evidence to determine whether the finding of
guilt made by the trier of fact is supported by substantial
evidence. United States v. Ybarra, 70 F.3d 362, 364 (5th Cir.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-50890
-2-
1995). Evidence is sufficient if “any rational trier of fact
could have found that the evidence established guilt beyond a
reasonable doubt.” United States v. Shelton, 325 F.3d 553, 557
(5th Cir. 2003). We view all evidence in the light most
favorable to the Government and defer to all reasonable
inferences drawn by the trier of fact. Ybarra, 70 F.3d at 364.
The evidence established that Smith had been drinking and
that she had been driving. Officers at the scene testified that
Smith’s breath smelled of alcohol, that her eyes were glossy, and
that she did not speak in a normal volume. Smith failed all
three field sobriety tests that were administered at the scene.
The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the
Government, was sufficient to convict Smith of being drunk while
driving on Fort Sam Houston. See Ybarra, 70 F.3d at 364.
AFFIRMED.