IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-17-00415-CV
IN RE ULLJA KUNTZE
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 14, 2017, Kuntze filed a document which is properly characterized
as a petition for writ of mandamus. In a separate proceeding, In Re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-
CV, we have explained that such a document is not filed within an existing appeal, but
rather is docketed as its own proceeding. See In re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-CV, 2017 Tex. App.
LEXIS 12038 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 27, 2017, orig. proceeding).
In this proceeding, Kuntze is critical of the Clerk of this Court for not responding
to Kuntze’s demands by the deadline set by Kuntze and for failing to notify the trial court
clerk of what Kuntze perceives as deficiencies in the clerk’s record. Kuntze seeks to have
the Court’s Clerk removed from office. Kuntze’s complaint is frivolous. We do not have
jurisdiction to remove the Clerk in this manner.
Kuntze’s petition is dismissed.
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Petition dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed January 3, 2018
[OT06]
In re Kuntze Page 2
in Re Ullja Kuntze
Combined Opinion