NUMBER 13-17-00226-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
MARTIN VAZQUEZ GUTIERREZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 22nd District Court
of Hays County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Valdez, and Justices Contreras and Benavides
Order Per Curiam
Appellant, Martin Vazquez Gutierrez, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court
from his conviction in trial court cause number CR-16-0239.1 The trial court's certification
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a
docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West, Westlaw through 2017 C.S.).
of the defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
On August 31, 2017, we ordered appellant's counsel, Gary E. Prust, to, within thirty
days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4. Counsel requested an extension of time to file
a response which was granted by this Court until December 20, 2017.
No response to this Court's order has been received. Therefore, we abate this
appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for a hearing to determine why counsel
has failed to comply with this Court's order. The trial court's findings and conclusions
shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court shall file the
supplemental clerk's record and reporter's record, if any, with the Clerk of this Court within
thirty days of the date of this order.
If the trial court determines that counsel is unable to represent appellant in this
matter, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to
prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant is entitled to
appointed counsel. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 (1988); Stafford v. State,
813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We further direct the trial court to issue
findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. Should the trial court find
that appellant desires to pursue this appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed
counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address,
email address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included
in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
2
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
12th day of January, 2018.
3