COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00197-CV
Style: Leticia B. Loya v. Miguel Loya, Vitol, Inc., Michael Metz, and Antonio “Tony” Maarraoul
Date motion filed*: January 29, 2018
Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file motions for rehearing and en banc reconsideration
Party filing motion: Appellant
Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated?
If motion to extend time:
Original due date: December 24, 2016
Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date:
Date Requested: Fifteen days
Ordered that motion is:
Granted
If document is to be filed, document due:
Denied
Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
Other: _____________________________________
Our judgment in this case issued on November 29, 2016, and our mandate issued on February 10, 2017.
Our plenary power has expired. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1. A motion for rehearing or motion for en banc
reconsideration may be filed within fifteen days after the court of appeals’ judgment is rendered. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 49.1. A court of appeals may extend the time to file a motion for rehearing or a motion for en
banc reconsideration if the motion in proper form is filed no later than fifteen days from the last date for
filing the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.8. A motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration
filed after a court of appeals’ plenary power has expired does not revest the court with jurisdiction to
reconsider the case. See Perez v. State, No. 01-10-00243-CR, 2011 WL 2923874, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] July 21, 2011, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3.
Accordingly, appellant’s motion for extension of time to file motions for rehearing and en banc
reconsideration is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: February 6, 2018
November 7, 2008 Revision