AT&T Inc. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas v. Andrea Christian and Amber Hicks

Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 9, 2018

S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-17-01395-CV

AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T
TEXAS, Appellants
V.
ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
Seeking to appeal the trial court’s denial of their rule 91a motion to dismiss a baseless

claim, appellants have filed a petition for permissive interlocutory appeal. We deny the petition

and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §

51.014(d) (West Supp. 2017); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3, 42.3(a).

/Carolyn Wright/
CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE

171395F.P05
 S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District
BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A Court, Dallas County, Texas
AT&T TEXAS, Appellants Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
No. 05-17-01395-CV V. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart
participating.
ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER
HICKS, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want
of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that appellees ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS recover
their costs of this appeal from appellants AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS.

Judgment entered February 9, 2018

–2–