Seiders v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-117V Filed: January 26, 2018 Not for Publication ************************************* H.S., a Minor, by his PARENT AND * NATURAL GUARDIAN, * AMANDA SEIDERS, * * Petitioner, * Damages decision based on * stipulation; Hib vaccine; acute v. * cerebellar ataxia * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* John R. Howie, Jr., Dallas, TX, for petitioner. Claudia B. Gangi, Washington, DC, for respondent. MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On January 25, 2018, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that her son, H.S., suffered acute cerebellar ataxia that was caused by his December 12, 2013 receipt of Haemophilus influenzae type B (“Hib”) vaccine. Respondent denies that Hib vaccine caused H.S.’s acute cerebellar ataxia or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall delete such material from public access. The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards the following vaccine compensation payments under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) (2012): a. A lump sum of $899,387.81, representing compensation for first year life care expenses ($308,087.81) and trust seed funds ($591,300.00), in the form of a check payable to Regions Bank, as trustee of the grantor reversionary trust established for the benefit of H.S.; b. A lump sum of $1,075,383.88, representing compensation for lost future earnings ($825,383.88) and pain and suffering ($250,000.00), in the form of a check payable to petitioner as guardian/conservator of the estate of H.S. for the benefit of H.S.; c. A lump sum of $32,240.10, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and d. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the stipulation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2018 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.