Ronald McClary v. Lieutenant Crosson

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7323 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT CROSSON; OFFICER WILLIAMS; OFFICER HICKS; OFFICER WALLS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03259-D) Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: February 28, 2018 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Crosson, No. 5:15-ct-03259-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2