B. H. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

Summarize Case

Related Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-18-00101-CV B. H., Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-17-002450, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant B.H., who is the respondent father of the subject child, has filed a notice of appeal from an order in aid of an investigation by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services of a report of child abuse or neglect. In the order, the trial court authorized a forensic interview of B.H.’s child and ordered B.H. to fully cooperate with the Department’s investigation. On February 22, 2018, this Court notified the parties that our appellate jurisdiction was questionable and requested a response from B.H. that explained how this Court may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. B.H. has filed a response in which he contends that this Court has jurisdiction because the order being appealed is a final judgment that disposes of all pending parties and claims. We, however, have not found authority that would support the exercise of appellate jurisdiction here. See Tex. Fam. Code § 261.303 (authorizing trial courts to enter orders in aid of investigations by Department of reports of child abuse or neglect); In re Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 255 S.W.3d 613, 615 (Tex. 2008) (describing order entered pursuant to section 261.303 of Family Code as temporary order); In re S.D., No. 09-11-00192-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4893, at *1–2 (Tex. App.—Beaumont June 30, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (concluding that order in aid of investigation of child abuse or neglect was temporary order that was not subject to interlocutory appeal and dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction); see also Tex. Fam. Code § 105.001(e) (explaining that temporary orders entered under section are not subject to interlocutory appeal). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: March 9, 2018 2