[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 05-11376 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar September 2, 2005
________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 90-00138-CR-WS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRIC BERNARD JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(September 2, 2005)
Before ANDERSON, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Cedric Bernard Jackson in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
Jackson because, in her view, Jackson’s appeal has no merit. Counsel has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED and the revocation of Jackson’s supervised release and 24-
month sentence are AFFIRMED.
United States v. Cedric Bernard Jackson
Combined Opinion