Actavious Langston v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ March 22, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A18A1250. ACTAVIOUS LANGSTON v. THE STATE. A jury found Actavious Langston guilty of armed robbery, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and pointing a pistol at another, and his convictions were affirmed on appeal in an unpublished opinion. See Case Number A10A1300, decided Sept. 21, 2010. Langston subsequently filed a “Motion for Hearing on Constitutional Claims,” which the trial court construed as an extraordinary motion for new trial. The trial court denied the motion, and Langston filed this direct appeal.1 Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7), an order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by application for discretionary appeal. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/22/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 1 Langston appealed to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case to this Court.