Digital Ally, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2017-2296 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:16-cv-02032-CM-TJJ, Judge Carlos Murguia. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES F.B. DANIELS, McDowell, Rice, Smith & Bu- chanan, PC, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiff- appellant. PAMELA BETH PETERSEN, Axon Enterprise, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN D. GARRETSON, LYNN C. HERNDON, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 2, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court