Paige v Paige (2018 NY Slip Op 04155)
Decided on June 8, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
589 CA 17-01587
| Paige v Paige |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 04155 |
| Decided on June 8, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 8, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
589 CA 17-01587
[*1]LYNN PAIGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
ROBERT PAIGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
v
ROBERT PAIGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
LAW OFFICE OF MAURICE J. VERRILLO, P.C., ROCHESTER (MAURICE J. VERRILLO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DUKE LAW FIRM, P.C., LAKEVILLE (SUSAN K. DUKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Kristin F. Splain, R.), entered November 15, 2016. The order, inter alia, equitably distributed the marital assets of the parties.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988, 988 [4th Dept 1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1st Dept 1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: June 8, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court