Jose Jaime Rodriguez v. State

NUMBER 13-17-00635-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG JOSE JAIME RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam This cause is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to withdraw counsel, appoint counsel, and extend time to file brief. Counsel states a potential conflict of interest has arisen that precludes counsel’s continued representation of appellant. Counsel is requesting the deadline for filing appellant’s brief be extended thirty days until July 27, 2018. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this order. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order. Appellant's second motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before July 27, 2018. It is so ordered. PER CURIAM Do Not Publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 22nd day of June, 2018. 2