NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
VICTORIA L. LOWENSTEIN & )
JEFFREY B. LOWENSTEIN, )
)
Appellants, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D16-4252
)
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, )
AS TRUSTEE FOR CREDIT SUISSE )
FIRST BOSTON MBS HEAT 2004-4. )
)
Appellee. )
)
Opinion filed August 8, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco
County; William H. Burgess, II, Judge.
Dineen Pashoukos Wasylik and Jared
M. Krukar of DPW Legal, Tampa, for
Appellants.
Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig,
P.A., Ft. Lauderdale; and M. Hope Keating,
and Karusha Y. Sharpe of Greenberg
Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
KELLY, Judge.
Victoria1 and Jeffrey Lowenstein appeal from the final judgment of
foreclosure, the order denying their motion for rehearing and to set aside judgment, and
the "Final Order on All Defendants' Motions." We affirm the final judgment of
foreclosure but reverse the portions of the Final Order that deny the objection to the
foreclosure sale, the motion to vacate the October 22, 2015, foreclosure sale, and the
motion to vacate the order directing the Clerk of Court to issue the certificate of title and
disburse funds.
"It is well settled that a foreclosure sale cannot be held while a timely
motion for rehearing is pending because enforcement of a final judgment is suspended
by the filing of the rehearing motion." 944 CWELT–2007 LLC v. Bank of Am., N.A., 194
So. 3d 470, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); see also Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A., 137 So. 3d
1039, 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (setting aside the foreclosure sale of property because
the sale was conducted while Hoffman's timely motion for rehearing was pending); Diaz
v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 239 So. 3d 151, 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), review denied, No. SC18-
306, 2018 WL 2684471 (Fla. June 5, 2018) (holding that the mortgagors were entitled to
vacation of the foreclosure sale that was conducted while the mortgagors' motion for
rehearing of the foreclosure judgment remained pending). Here, the foreclosure sale
was conducted while the Lowensteins' motion for rehearing remained pending.
Therefore, we reverse the Final Order and remand with instructions for the trial court to
1The appellants' counsel filed a suggestion of death informing this court
that Victoria Lowenstein died on May 18, 2018. Ms. Lowenstein's death does not affect
the disposition of this appeal. See Colucci v. Colucci, 309 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA
1975); Variety Children's Hosp., Inc. v. Perkins, 382 So. 2d 331, 336 (Fla. 3d DCA
1980).
-2-
set a new foreclosure sale date and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
In all other respects, we affirm.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part with directions.
SILBERMAN and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
-3-