TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00526-CV
Thomas Kam, Appellant
v.
Badruddin Karedia and Tony Hardt, Appellees
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. C-1-CV-16-007167, HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Thomas Kam, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on August 3, 2018, with the trial
court, along with a request for findings of fact.1 On September 5, 2018, the Clerk of this Court
advised appellant that it appears that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter because this
Court’s jurisdiction is limited to appeals in which there exists a final and appealable judgment or
order which has been signed by a judge. The Clerk requested that he file a response by September
17, 2018, explaining how this Court may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal and advised him
that the failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
1
We hold appellant to the same legal standards as parties represented by counsel, “even
as we liberally construe [his] arguments and filings.” See Stewart v. Texas Health & Human Servs.
Comm’n, No. 03-09-00226-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 9787, at *5–6 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Austin
Dec. 9, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[P]ro se appellants are held to the same standard as parties
represented by counsel to avoid giving unrepresented parties an advantage over represented parties.”
(citing Mansfield State Bank v. Cohn, 573 S.W.2d 181, 184–85 (Tex. 1978))).
Appellant’s notice of appeal and his response to this Court’s letter confirm that
the trial court has not signed a final and appealable judgment or order which would invoke
this Court’s appellate jurisdiction, and appellant has asked for no other relief. Cf. In re Tarvin,
No. 01-11-01127-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3277, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 24,
2012, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (construing petition for writ of procedendo as petition for
writ of mandamus “because, in substance, relator seeks to compel the trial court to rule on his
application”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
_____________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: September 28, 2018
2