FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDUARDO DE LA TORRE; LORI Nos. 14-17571
SAYSOURIVONG, 15-15042
Plaintiffs-Appellants/
Cross-Appellees, D.C. No.
3:08-cv-03174-
v. MEJ
CASHCALL, INC., OPINION
Defendant-Appellee/
Cross-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Maria-Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 16, 2017
Submitted September 17, 2018
San Francisco, California
Filed October 3, 2018
2 DE LA TORRE V. CASHCALL
Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Andrew D. Hurwitz,
Circuit Judges, and Lynn S. Adelman, * District Judge.
Per Curiam Opinion
COUNSEL
James C. Sturdevant (argued), The Sturdevant Law Firm,
San Francisco, California; Jessica Riggin and Steven M.
Tindall, Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP, San Francisco,
California; Arthur D. Levy, Law Office of Arthur D. Levy,
San Francisco, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-
Appellees.
Brad W. Seiling (argued), Donald R. Brown, and Joanna S.
McCallum, Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP, Los Angeles,
California, for Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Caryn Becker, Oakland, California, as and for Amicus
Curiae Center for Responsible Lending.
Ted Mermin, Berkeley, California, as and for Amicus Curiae
Public Good Law Center.
Michael J. Quirk, Williams Cuker Berezofsky LLC,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Amicus Curiae National
Association of Consumer Advocates.
*
The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for
the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.
DE LA TORRE V. CASHCALL 3
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
In light of the judgment of the Supreme Court of
California in De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc., No. S241434,
422 P.3d 1004 (Cal. 2018), the judgment of the district court
is VACATED and this case is REMANDED to that court
for further proceedings consistent with that opinion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Eduardo De La Torre v. Cashcall, Inc.
Combined Opinion