In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-17-00065-CR
THOMAS RANDAZZO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 336th District Court
Fannin County, Texas
Trial Court No. CR-15-25590
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
ORDER
Court reporter Charla Reamy recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause
number 06-17-00065-CR, styled Thomas Randazzo v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number
CR-15-25590, in the 336th Judicial District Court of Fannin County, Texas. Thomas Randazzo
has requested a copy of that record.
Prior to releasing volume six of the reporter’s record, we asked Reamy to redact sensitive
data from that portion of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10. Reamy has respectfully declined
our request to redact the sensitive data. Under Rule 9.10, sensitive data includes
(1) a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax
identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number;
(2) [a] bank account number, credit card number, and other financial account
number; [and]
(3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor
at the time the offense was committed.
TEX. R. APP. 9.10(a). Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper
filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.”
Further, “[t]he filing of a document constitutes a certification by the filer that the document
complies with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this rule.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(e).
Having determined that volume six of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we
hereby ORDER Reamy to redact any and all sensitive data, as that phrase is defined by Rule 9.10,
from volume six. 1
1
Volume six of the reporter’s record is an exhibit volume. This order does not require redaction of original exhibits.
In accordance with Rule 9.10(d), “Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter “X” in place of each omitted
2
The redacted volume six of the reporter’s record is to be received no later than Thursday,
November 1. If the redacted reporter’s record is not received by November 1, we warn Reamy
that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held
in contempt of this Court for failing to obey its order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: October 17, 2018
digit or character or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating that the data has been redacted.” TEX. R.
APP. P. 9.10(d).
3