Case: 17-51015 Document: 00514714643 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 17-51015 FILED
Summary Calendar November 7, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
JEFFREY TODD,
Plaintiff−Appellant,
versus
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REGINALD D. HAWKINS;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JEFFERY W. CRAIGHEAD;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ANTHONY V. MARRERO,
Defendants−Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
No. 6:16-CV-288
Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Jeffrey Todd, former Texas
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-51015 Document: 00514714643 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2018
No. 17-51015
prisoner #1803650, appeals the judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights
action. After a two-day trial, the jury found that excessive force was not used
against Todd, and the district court entered judgment in favor of the defen-
dants, ordering that Todd take nothing. The court also denied Todd’s post-
judgment motion for a new trial, but neither Todd’s notice of appeal nor his
appellate brief evinces an intent to appeal that order. See FED. R. APP.
P. 3(c)(1)(B); Lockett v. Anderson, 230 F.3d 695, 699−700 (5th Cir. 2000).
Todd challenges the verdict primarily on the basis that his trial counsel
allegedly rendered ineffective assistance. But because the Sixth Amendment
“right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation,” San-
chez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986), any deficient
conduct by Todd’s attorney does not constitute a basis for invalidating the judg-
ment, see id.
Additionally, Todd has not provided a trial transcript and has stated that
a transcript is unnecessary for appeal purposes. Thus, to the extent that Todd
seeks to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, we cannot review the evi-
dence supporting the verdict without the transcript. See RecoverEdge L.P. v.
Pentecost, 44 F.3d 1284, 1289 (5th Cir. 1995) (citing Richardson v. Henry,
902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir. 1990) (dismissing appeal based on sufficiency of the
evidence because appellant failed to include a transcript)), overruled on other
grounds as recognized by In re Ritz, 832 F.3d 560 (5th Cir. 2016).
For these reasons, we decline to review the verdict. The judgment is
AFFIRMED. Todd’s motions for appointment of counsel and oral argument
are DENIED.
2