| Loreto v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 07617 |
| Decided on November 9, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
1202 CA 17-01134
v
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-C5, TIMOTHY FOSTER, AS RECEIVER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, KENNETH P. RAY, JR., EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH P. RAY, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
JOSEPH A. TADDEO, JR., ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT PATRICK LORETO, IN THE RIGHT OF AND ON BEHALF OF ENCORE PROPERTIES OF ROCHESTER, LLC.
FELT EVANS, LLP, CLINTON (JAY G. WILLIAMS, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (GREGORY J. MCDONALD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT TIMOTHY FOSTER, AS RECEIVER.
RIKER DANZIG SCHERER HYLAND & PERRETTI LLP, MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY (MICHAEL R. O'DONNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-C5.
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered May 8, 2017. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C5 to confirm in part and reject in part the preliminary report by the referee.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: November 9, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court