in Re Tennesee Gas Pipeline Company, Inc.

Related Cases

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a Division of Tenneco Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Berkshire Gas Company, Intervenor. Valley Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Intervenors
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a Division of Tenneco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a Division of Tenneco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tennessee Small General Service Customer Group
Anr Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Union Gas Limited, Progas Limited, Northern Minnesota Utilities, Long Island Lighting Company, Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Intervenors. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Union Gas Limited, Progas Limited, Anr Pipeline Company, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Northern Minnesota Utitilities, Intervenors. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Progas Limited, Northern Minnesota Utilities, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Anr Pipeline Company, Long Island Lighting Company, Intervenors. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Anr Pipeline Company, Progas Limited, Michigan Gas Company, Long Island Lighting Company, Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Northern Minnesota Utilities, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Intervenors. Independent Petroleum Association of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Progas Limited, Northern Minnesota Utilities, Transcanada Pipeline Limited, Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Union Gas Limited, Intervenors

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 28, 2018 No. 04-18-00882-CV IN RE TENNESEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, INC. Original Mandamus Proceeding1 ORDER Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice2 Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice On November 20, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. A majority of the panel believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than December 14, 2018. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. It is so ORDERED on November 28, 2018. PER CURIAM ATTESTED TO: ____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17-03-17323-CV, styled Juan Perez, Jr. and Rose Perez v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Inc., pending in the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell presiding. 2 Justice Martinez votes to deny the petition.