United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-41208
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FELICIA ROBERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:04-CR-4-TJW-CMC
--------------------
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Felicia Roberson appeals from a guilty-plea conviction for
possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute and for
aiding and abetting in the offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1);
18 U.S.C. § 2.
For the first time on appeal, Roberson argues that the
district court erred in imposing a sentence under a mandatory
guideline scheme, in violation of United States v. Booker, 542
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-41208
-2-
U.S. 220 (2005). We review for plain error. See United States
v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir.), cert.
denied, 126 S. Ct. 267 (2005). Roberson has not shown that the
district court would have sentenced her differently under an
advisory sentencing scheme. Accordingly, Roberson has failed to
show that the district court’s imposition of a sentence under a
mandatory guideline scheme was plain error. See id. at 733-34.
AFFIRMED.