NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-50412
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:16-cr-02609-BEN
v.
ARTURO DELGADO-VEGA, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 27, 2018**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Arturo Delgado-Vega appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction
for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
and remand for resentencing.
Delgado-Vega contends that the district court improperly denied his request
for a minor-role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because it, inter alia, improperly
compared him only to known co-participants in his offense while failing to
consider other likely co-participants. We review the district court’s interpretation
of the Guidelines de novo, and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for
abuse of discretion. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th
Cir. 2017) (en banc).
After Delgado-Vega was sentenced, this court issued its opinion in United
States v. Diaz, 884 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2018). In Diaz, we reaffirmed the principle
that, under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, “when measuring a defendant’s culpability relative
to that of other participants, district courts must compare the defendant’s
involvement to that of all likely participants in the criminal scheme,” even if they
are unnamed. See id. at 916-17. Diaz also noted that “when a defendant knows
little about the scope and structure of the criminal enterprise in which he was
involved, that fact weighs in favor of granting a minor-role adjustment.” Id. at
917. Because the district court did not have the benefit of Diaz, and because we
cannot determine on this record whether the district court considered all likely co-
participants in the offense, we vacate Delgado-Vega’s sentence and remand for
resentencing.
2 17-50412
If, on remand, the district court again denies Delgado-Vega’s request for a
minor-role reduction, it shall consider whether the government has met its burden
to establish that the offense involved the importation of methamphetamine, as is
necessary to impose an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(5), see United
States v. Pimentel-Flores, 339 F.3d 959, 968 (9th Cir. 2003), and shall explain
what evidence supports the enhancement if it is imposed, see United States v.
Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
In light of this disposition, we do not address Delgado-Vega’s argument that
his sentence is substantively unreasonable.
VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.
3 17-50412