NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A.,
Appellant
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC., BLIZZARD
ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
Appellees
______________________
2017-1999
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-
01804.
______________________
Decided: January 9, 2019
______________________
MINGHUI YANG, Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin,
TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR G.
HARDY.
DANIEL T. SHVODIAN, Perkins Coie, LLP, Palo Alto,
CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by
CHRISTOPHER LEE KELLEY, WING LIANG, VICTORIA Q.
SMITH; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH.
______________________
2 AC TECHS. v. AMAZON.COM
Before MOORE, SCHALL, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
Before us is AC Technologies S.A.’s appeal of the Pa-
tent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision that all claims of
U.S. Patent 8,656,125 are unpatentable. On appeal, AC
raises arguments substantially identical to those we
rejected today in AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com,
Inc., No. 18-1433. For the reasons explained in that
decision, we affirm the Board.
AFFIRMED
COSTS
Costs to Appellees.