Reginald Keith Thomas v. State

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-18-00175-CR REGINALD KEITH THOMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-290-C1 ORDER Appellant requests an extension of time to file his response to a motion to withdraw and a supporting Anders brief in this appeal. Appellant has requested 90 additional days because his access to the law library where he is in prison, and his legal knowledge, is limited. In a separate document, appellant also requests the appointment of new counsel. Neither of these documents are properly served. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5. The Clerk of this Court does not accept service for the McLennan County District Attorney. Nevertheless, we use Rule 2 to proceed to a timely disposition of appellant’s requests. Id. 2. Because appellant need not file a formal brief which contains specific references to the record or case authorities but only a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and Anders brief, appellant’s response is sufficient if it directs the Court to the issues upon which appellant believes the trial court erred. In conducting its review of the entire record for possible error, the Court will give special attention to the issues to which the Court is directed by appellant’s response. If the Court is persuaded that an issue is not frivolous and might support an argument for error, then the Court will remand this appeal to the trial court for the appointment of new counsel to fully brief the issue. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 409 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Accordingly, because the form of a response to an Anders brief is relatively less restrictive in nature than that which is necessary for a formal brief, appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his response is granted in part. Appellant’s response is due 35 days from the date of this order. Further, because new counsel is not appointed unless this Court decides an issue is not frivolous and might support an argument for error, appellant’s motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. Id. PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, and Justice Davis Motion for extension granted in part Motion for appointment of counsel denied Order issued and filed January 23, 2019 Thomas v. State Page 2