AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed January 25, 2019.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-00805-CR
No. 05-18-00830-CR
ROBERT BERNARD RICHARDSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-76782-U, F17-18579-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Nowell
Appellant Robert Bernard Richardson waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to aggravated
assault with a deadly weapon and possession of cocaine in an amount of one gram or more but less
than four grams. After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at ten years’
imprisonment in each case. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes
the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record
showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d
807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of
Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to
file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,
319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief
filed by counsel).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/Erin A. Nowell/
ERIN A. NOWELL
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
180805F.U05
–2–
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ROBERT BERNARD RICHARDSON, On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District
Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F15-76782-U.
No. 05-18-00805-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell.
Justices Schenck and Reichek participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered this 25th day of January, 2019.
–3–
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ROBERT BERNARD RICHARDSON, On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District
Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F17-18579-U.
No. 05-18-00830-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell.
Justices Schenck and Reichek participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered this 25th day of January, 2019.
–4–