IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IRIS R. RYANS, §
§ No. 197, 2018
Defendant Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court of the
§ State of Delaware
v. §
§ C.A. No. 09L-06-078
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., §
§
Plaintiff Below, §
Appellee. §
Submitted: December 14, 2018
Decided: February 19, 2019
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
(1) The appellant, Iris R. Ryans, filed this appeal from an order of the
Superior Court dated March 28, 2018, denying her motion to vacate a default
judgment entered against her in 2010 in a mortgage foreclosure action.1 We find no
merit to the appeal and affirm on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the
Superior Court’s order.
(2) The record reflects that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
(“MERS”) filed a complaint on June 22, 2009, seeking to foreclose on Ryans’
mortgaged property on Ashby Lane in Dover. The Kent County Sheriff’s Office
1
2018 WL 1578168 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 28, 2018).
was instructed to serve the complaint and summons on Ryans. The return of service,
filed on July 8, 2009, indicated that the Sheriff served the complaint and summons
on Ryans on July 7, 2009. Ryans failed to answer the complaint.
(3) MERS obtained a default judgment against Ryans in August 2010.
After several delays, a Sheriff’s Sale was scheduled for August 2017.
(4) In July 2017, Ryans filed an affidavit and a motion to set aside
judgment contending that she “never received a summons,” and that the former Kent
County Sheriff “was untrustworthy to sign a sheriff’s return.” JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as MERS’ assignee, filed a response opposing the motion.
(5) After several continuances, the Superior Court held a hearing on March
23, 2018 on the motion to set aside judgment. By order dated March 28, 2018, the
Superior Court denied the motion after finding that Ryans had “presented no proof
or evidence whatsoever to rebut the presumption of proper service.”2
(6) On appeal, Ryans continues to deny that she was served with the
complaint and summons on July 7, 2009.3
(7) The decision to grant or deny a motion to vacate a default judgment
under Superior Court Civil Rule 60(b) is within the sound discretion of the Superior
2
Id.
3
Ryans chose not to order the preparation of the hearing transcript for the appeal.
2
Court.4 Ryans has failed to demonstrate any reason justifying relief from judgment
under Rule 60(b). We find no abuse of discretion in the Superior Court’s denial of
Ryans’ motion to set aside judgment.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura
Justice
4
Bailey v. The Bank of New York Mellon, 2016 WL 6609165 (Del. Nov. 7, 2016) (citing Battaglia
v. Wilmington Savings Fund Soc’y, 379 A.2d 1132, 1135 (Del. 1977)).
3