Vick v. Khan

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STACIA VICK and CHADWICK § VICK, § § No. 491, 2018 Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § Court Below: Superior Court of the § State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. K17C-09-007 DR. NASREEN KHAN, KHAN § AND ASSOCIATES, P.A., § BAYHEALTH INC., BAYHEALTH § MEDICAL CENTER, and KENT § GENERAL HOSPITAL, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. § Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: February 21, 2019 Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices. ORDER (1) The plaintiffs-appellants seek interlocutory review of the Superior Court’s bench ruling of January 5, 2018 and the court’s order of August 22, 2018 in the plaintiffs’ medical negligence action. The January 5, 2018 bench ruling dismissed Counts III through VIII of the plaintiffs’ complaint as time-barred. The August 22, 2018 order affirmed a Commissioner’s order denying the plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint.1 (2) By order dated September 19, 2018, the Superior Court denied the plaintiffs’ application for certification of an interlocutory appeal after finding that neither the January 5 bench ruling nor the August 22 order determined a substantial issue of material importance meriting appellate review before final judgment. (3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances.2 In the exercise of our discretion, we conclude that the plaintiffs’ application for interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for certification under Supreme Court Rule 42. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is REFUSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice 1 2018 WL 4026692 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 22, 2018). 2 Del. Sup. Ct. R. 42(d)(v). 2