IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-06,598-33
EX PARTE THORNTON RAY PROPHET, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 262195-R IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of attempted
aggravated rape and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that he is being held past his maximum discharge date because TDCJ has
not properly restored previously-earned good time credits after his most recent parole revocation.
Although habeas corpus is not the proper means for challenging good time credit calculations in
most cases, Applicant’s conviction falls under the pre-65th Legislature law and he is entitled to
discharge his sentence when his flat time plus his good time add up to his ninety-nine year sentence.
2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional
facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960),
the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.
The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General
Counsel to file an affidavit listing Applicant’s sentence begin date, and his history of parole releases
and revocations. The affidavit shall state whether or not Applicant is receiving credit for any of the
time spent on parole. The affidavit shall also state whether Applicant’s previously-earned good time,
work time, and bonus time credits have been appropriately restored as required by the law in effect
at the time of Applicant’s offense. Finally, the affidavit should indicate whether or not Applicant
is required to submit his claim to the time credit resolution system of TDCJ, and if so, whether he
has submitted such a claim and the date when the claim was submitted.
The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. In the appropriate
case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing.
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s
previously-earned good time, work time and bonus time credits have been restored, and whether his
sentence and maximum discharge date are being properly calculated. The trial court shall also make
any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the
disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
3
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: February 27, 2019
Do not publish