UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1670
ENRIQUE ALEXANDER HERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: March 11, 2019 Decided: March 28, 2019
Before WILKINSON and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph A. Devamithran, LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH A. DEVAMITHRAN, Annandale,
Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Paul
Fiorino, Senior Litigation Counsel, Timothy Bo Stanton, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Enrique Alexander Hernandez Rodriguez (Rodriguez), a native and citizen of El
Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
dismissing Rodriguez’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications
for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We
have reviewed the arguments pressed by Rodriguez in conjunction with the certified
administrative record, including the transcript of the merits hearing and all supporting
evidence, and the relevant legal authorities. Despite Rodriguez’s assertions to the
contrary, we conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any
of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence “on the record considered as a whole” supports the denial of relief in
this case, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992) (internal quotation marks
omitted).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Rodriguez (B.I.A. May 15, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2