Dexcom, Inc. v. Waveform Technologies, Inc.

         NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                   DEXCOM, INC.,
                     Appellant

                           v.

        WAVEFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
                    Appellee
             ______________________

                 2018-1752, 2018-1753
                ______________________

    Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-
01679, IPR2016-01680.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC,
argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID B.
COCHRAN, CALVIN GRIFFITH, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW
JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; SCOTT
E. DAVIS, JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman,
LLP, Portland, OR.

   SCOTT D. EADS, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Port-
land, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by
NICHOLAS (NIKA) FREMONT ALDRICH, JR., SARA KOBAK,
JASON ADAM WRUBLESKI.
              ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

      PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir-
cuit Judges).
                AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT



April 3, 2019                  /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Date                       Peter R. Marksteiner
                               Clerk of Court