United States v. William Broxton

Case: 18-13659 Date Filed: 04/24/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13659 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 7:04-cr-00020-HL-TQL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM BROXTON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (April 24, 2019) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-13659 Date Filed: 04/24/2019 Page: 2 of 2 Erin Pinder, appointed counsel for William Broxton in this appeal from the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Broxton’s § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction is AFFIRMED. 2