Case: 18-10457 Date Filed: 04/29/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-10457
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:96-cv-00232-JES-CM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARK & ERIC FEINSTEIN,
Defendants-Appellants.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 29, 2019)
Before BRANCH, GRANT, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mark and Eric Feinstein’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
The magistrate judge’s January 4, 2018 order, as clarified on April 13, 2018, is not
final and appealable because it merely allowed post-judgment discovery to
Case: 18-10457 Date Filed: 04/29/2019 Page: 2 of 2
proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Rouse Constr. Int’l, Inc. v. Rouse Constr. Corp.,
680 F.2d 743, 746 (11th Cir. 1982) (“[T]he granting of a post-judgment discovery
motion is not an appealable final order.”).
2