Hogan v Vandewater (2019 NY Slip Op 03486)
Decided on May 3, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
219 CA 18-01894
| Hogan v Vandewater |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 03486 |
| Decided on May 3, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 3, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
219 CA 18-01894
[*1]MARK HOGAN AND ELIZABETH HOGAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF JACK A. HOGAN, AN INFANT, AND ITHACA G. HOGAN, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
DAVID VANDEWATER AND GINA NICOLETTI, DEFENDANTS, AND FRANK P. ROSE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 4.)
v
DAVID VANDEWATER AND GINA NICOLETTI, DEFENDANTS, AND FRANK P. ROSE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 4.)
BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SLYE LAW OFFICES, P.C., WATERTOWN (ROBERT J. SLYE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered May 5, 2017. The judgment, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Frank P. Rose.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Hogan v Vandewater ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [May 3, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: May 3, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court