| Abizeid v Turner Constr. Co. |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 03556 |
| Decided on May 8, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 8, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.
2017-12691
(Index No. 23538/10)
v
Turner Construction Company, et al., appellants, et al., defendants.
Malapero & Prisco, LLP, New York, NY (George L. Mahoney of counsel), for appellants.
Thomas Pietrantonio, P.C., Port Washington, NY, for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Turner Construction Company, Wolkow-Braker Roofing Corp., Kings County Waterproofing Corp., and Botto Mechanical Corporation appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (James P. McCormack, J.), dated September 18, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the answer of those defendants.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
"The nature and degree of a penalty to be imposed under CPLR 3126 for discovery violations is addressed to the court's discretion" (Crupi v Rashid, 157 AD3d 858, 859). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the appellants' answer. The appellants' willful and contumacious conduct may be inferred from their undisputed failure, without an adequate excuse, to comply with an order of the court dated January 10, 2017, as well as from their previous failure to comply with the plaintiff's March 10, 2015, discovery demand (see Mears v Long, 149 AD3d 823, 824).
DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS-RADIX and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court