MEMORANDUM DECISION
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED
this Memorandum Decision shall not be
regarded as precedent or cited before any May 20 2019, 9:25 am
court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK
Indiana Supreme Court
the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals
and Tax Court
estoppel, or the law of the case.
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Valerie K. Boots Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
Marion County Public Defender Agency Attorney General of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana Samantha M. Sumcad
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Christian Morris, May 20, 2019
Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.
18A-CR-2414
v. Appeal from the Marion Superior
Court
State of Indiana, The Honorable Christina
Appellee-Plaintiff. Klineman, Judge
Trial Court Cause No.
49G17-1802-F6-3872
Brown, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2414 | May 20, 2019 Page 1 of 6
[1] Christian Morris appeals his convictions for domestic battery as a level 6 felony
and criminal trespass as a class A misdemeanor. Morris raises two issues which
we consolidate and restate as whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his
convictions. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[2] Morris and R.S. have two daughters together, and R.S. has two other children.
Morris and R.S. ended their relationship in January 2017. In January 2018,
Morris and R.S. were not living together, their children were almost two years
old, and Morris had supervised visitation with his children pursuant to court
order. On January 25, 2018, R.S. left work and returned to her home with her
children. One of R.S.’s neighbors helped her bring the children inside. Morris
was at the apartment because he had visitation that evening. R.S. told her older
children, who were ten and six years old, to wash their hands, and she seated
her younger children at a table to eat. Morris was upset because the neighbor
was helping R.S. bring the children into the residence, and R.S. asked Morris to
leave. Morris “bumped [R.S.] with his shoulder” in her chest which hurt her,
and she started to fall or stumble back. Transcript Volume 2 at 9. When she
felt herself falling, R.S. grabbed onto Morris’s jacket, and he hit her in the face.
R.S. remembers her “hair getting pulled” and being “slammed against the
window.” Transcript Volume 2 at 10. Morris then pushed R.S. against the
wall. R.S.’s older children screamed, the neighbors came to the apartment, and
one of the children unlocked the door. Morris held R.S. against the wall “until
the door [was] open,” and the neighbors came into the apartment and told
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2414 | May 20, 2019 Page 2 of 6
Morris to get off of R.S. Id. at 24. Morris left the apartment, and the police
were contacted. The responding law enforcement officer observed that R.S.
was holding the side of her face and grimacing, noticed that the side of R.S.’s
face where she said she was hit appeared a little darker on her cheek area
compared to the other side, and photographed her face.
[3] On February 1, 2018, the State charged Morris with: Count I, domestic battery
in the presence of a child as a level 6 felony; Count II, domestic battery as a
class A misdemeanor; and Count III, criminal trespass as a class A
misdemeanor. At the bench trial, R.S. testified that Morris became upset and
she asked him to leave her apartment which he did not do. She testified that
Morris bumped her with his shoulder, she began to stumble or fall back, and
“when I felt myself fall, I grabbed on his - he was the closest to me - I grabbed
on to his jacket.” Id. at 10. When asked “how did he respond to that,” R.S.
testified: “I just remember my hair getting pulled and slammed against the
window.” Id. She testified that her younger children were sitting at a table in
the same room as her and were crying, that her older children were screaming,
the neighbors heard and came to her apartment, her oldest daughter unlocked
the door, and the neighbors came into the apartment. She indicated that Morris
pushed her against the wall. Morris testified he was thirty-four years old, that
he and R.S. had an argument which became physical, that she attempted to hit
him, that he grabbed her arm and shoved her, that he barely pushed her and she
went towards the wall, that she came back toward him swinging with her fists,
and that he held her down. The court found R.S. more credible, entered
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2414 | May 20, 2019 Page 3 of 6
judgments of conviction on Counts I and III, and sentenced Morris to 180 days
with 90 days suspended and 90 days executed on home detention concurrent on
each count.
Discussion
[4] The issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain Morris’s convictions
for domestic battery as a level 6 felony and criminal trespass as a class A
misdemeanor. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a
conviction, appellate courts must consider only the probative evidence and
reasonable inferences supporting the verdict. Drane v. State, 867 N.E.2d 144,
146 (Ind. 2007). It is the factfinder’s role, not that of appellate courts, to assess
witness credibility and weigh the evidence to determine whether it is sufficient
to support a conviction. Id. We consider the evidence most favorable to the
trial court’s ruling. Id. We will affirm unless no reasonable factfinder could
find the elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. The
evidence is sufficient if an inference may reasonably be drawn from it to support
the verdict. Id. at 147.
[5] Morris argues the State failed to prove that his touching of R.S. was done
knowingly or in a rude, insolent, or angry manner. He also argues the State
failed to prove that he refused to leave R.S.’s apartment or to leave within a
reasonable time after the request.
[6] Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1.3 provides in part that a person who knowingly or
intentionally touches a family or household member in a rude, insolent, or
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2414 | May 20, 2019 Page 4 of 6
angry manner commits domestic battery, and that the offense is a level 6 felony
if the person who committed the offense is at least eighteen years of age and
committed the offense in the physical presence of a child less than sixteen years
of age knowing that the child was present and might be able to see or hear the
offense. Ind. Code § 35-43-2-2 provides in part that a person who, not having a
contractual interest in the property, knowingly or intentionally refuses to leave
the real property of another person after having been asked to leave by the other
person commits criminal trespass as a class A misdemeanor. The element of
communication of denial of entry or request to leave necessarily implies a
reasonable period of time for the person receiving that communication to leave
of the person’s own volition. Curtis v. State, 58 N.E.3d 992, 994 (Ind. Ct. App.
2016). A person engages in conduct intentionally if, when he engages in the
conduct, it is his conscious objective to do so, and a person engages in conduct
knowingly if, when he engages in the conduct, he is aware of a high probability
that he is doing so. Ind. Code § 35-41-2-2.
[7] The record reveals R.S.’s testimony that she asked Morris to leave and that he
did not leave. The record further reveals that Morris bumped R.S. in her chest
with his shoulder, she started to stumble or fall back, and she grabbed onto
Morris’s jacket. R.S. testified that “I just remember my hair getting pulled and
slammed against the window.” Transcript Volume 2 at 10. R.S. testified that,
at that point, Morris pushed her against the wall. The evidence shows that the
children cried and screamed, the neighbors came to the apartment, and one of
the children let them inside. R.S. testified that Morris held her against the wall
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2414 | May 20, 2019 Page 5 of 6
until the door opened. As previously mentioned, this Court will not assess the
credibility of witnesses or reweigh the evidence. See Drane, 867 N.E.2d at 146.
Based upon the record, we conclude that the State presented evidence of a
probative nature from which a trier of fact could find beyond a reasonable
doubt that Morris committed the crimes of domestic battery and criminal
trespass.
[8] For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Morris’s convictions.
[9] Affirmed.
May, J., and Mathias, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2414 | May 20, 2019 Page 6 of 6