United States v. Hernandez

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS ________________________ No. ACM S32535 ________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Kyle R. HERNANDEZ Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant ________________________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 21 May 2019 ________________________ Military Judge: Mark F. Rosenow. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 19 April 2018 by SpCM convened at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia. For Appellant: Major Rebecca J. Otey, USAF; Major Mark J. Schwartz, USAF. For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire. Before JOHNSON, DENNIS, and LEWIS, Appellate Military Judges. ________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4. ________________________ PER CURIAM: The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er- ror materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles United States v. Hernandez, No. ACM S32535 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c) (2016). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED. * FOR THE COURT CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court * We note the court-martial order fails to reflect the plea and finding with respect to the Specification of Charge I. In addition, we note the court-martial order omits the language of the reprimand from the convening authority’s action. We direct the publi- cation of a corrected court-martial order to remedy these errors. 2