IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EASTERN DISTRICT
KONRAD KURACH, : No. 531 EAL 2018
:
Petitioner :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from
: the Order of the Superior Court
v. :
:
:
TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, :
:
Respondent :
MARK WINTERSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY : No. 532 EAL 2018
AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS :
SIMILARLY SITUATED :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from
: the Order of the Superior Court
v. :
:
:
TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of
payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash
value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent,
was nonetheless valid and enforceable?