Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. Reed O'Connor

Case: 18-11489 Document: 00514984280 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/05/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-11489 FILED June 5, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR., Clerk Plaintiff-Appellant v. JUDGE REED O’CONNOR, United States District Judge; E. SCOTT FROST, United States Magistrate Judge; MARCIA A. CRONE, United States District Judge; ZACK HAWTHORN, Magistrate Judge; MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, United States District Judge; K. NICOLE MITCHELL, Magistrate Judge, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CV-155 Before OWEN, WILLETT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr., Texas prisoner # 1656666, moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Because he has failed to show that he should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), see Banos v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998), * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-11489 Document: 00514984280 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/05/2019 No. 18-11489 Sheppard’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied. His motion for the appointment of counsel is also denied. The facts surrounding the IFP decision are inextricably intertwined with the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed as frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 2