[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 27, 2005
No. 04-11193 THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 02-61610-CV-WPD
CARMOLITE HYPPOLITE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TACO BELL CORP.,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(April 27, 2005)
Before DUBINA, PRYOR and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After a six-day trial, the jury rendered a verdict for defendant Taco Bell on
plaintiff’s claims for sexual harassment, retaliation and failure to pay overtime.
The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its instructions to the
jury and in granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on one
claim. After full consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record before
us, we find no reversible error in the trial or in the judgment based on the jury’s
findings and answers to the special interrogatories.
AFFIRMED.
2