People v. Gambardella

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 2019-07-31
Citations: 2019 NY Slip Op 5997
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
People v Gambardella (2019 NY Slip Op 05997)
People v Gambardella
2019 NY Slip Op 05997
Decided on July 31, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 31, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-08629
(Docket No. 2015KN082591)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Lisa Gambardella, appellant.




Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Sean Nuttall of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Rhea A. Grob, and Niki Bargueiras of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruce M. Balter, J.), rendered August 11, 2016, convicting her of attempted assault in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was charged, inter alia, with attempted assault in the third degree arising out of a physical altercation she had with her friend on December 26, 2015, in the storage facility of the apartment building where they both resided. After a nonjury trial, the defendant was convicted of attempted assault in the third degree.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15(5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

The Supreme Court did not err in precluding the defendant from calling a particular witness to testify (see People v Bouton, 50 NY2d 130, 139-140).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court