Corning Optical Communications v. Panduit Corp.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellant v. PANDUIT CORP., Appellee ______________________ 2018-1903, 2018-1905, 2018-2058 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016- 01703, IPR2016-01709, IPR2017-00029. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN C. O'QUINN, HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL. JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court