In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-1279V
Filed: June 6, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
RONALD BECKMAN,
Petitioner,
v. Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
Respondent.
Kate Gerayne Westad, SiebenCarey, Minneapolis, MN, for petitioner.
Glenn Alexander MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On September 18, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of his September 19, 2014 influenza (“flu”)
vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
Office of Special Masters.
On December 11, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner
entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On June 5, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on
1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $75,000.00.
Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the
proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that
petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
petitioner a lump sum payment of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
petitioner, Ronald Beckman. This amount represents compensation for all damages
that would be available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
*****************************
*
RONALD BECKMAN, *
*
Petitioner, *
*
v. * No. 17-1279V (ECF)
* CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER
* NORA BETH DORSEY
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*****************************
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On December 11, 2018, the Chief Special Master issued a ruling finding petitioner
entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act for a right shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), as a result of an influenza vaccination he received on September 19,
2014. Accordingly, respondent herein files his Proffer on the Award of Compensation for this
case.
I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded a lump sum total of $75,000.00, which amount represents compensation for all elements
of damages to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner
agrees.
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses and future pain and suffering. This proffer does not include any award for attorneys’
fees and costs that may be awarded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, who is a
competent adult. Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
JOSEPH H. HUNT
Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ GLENN A. MACLEOD
GLENN A. MACLEOD
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 616-4122
DATE: June 5, 2019
2