FILED
OCTOBER 1, 2019
In the Office of the Clerk of Court
WA State Court of Appeals, Division III
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION THREE
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 36421-6-III
)
Respondent, )
)
v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION
)
RANDALL GONZALEZ, )
)
Appellant. )
LAWRENCE-BERREY, C.J. — Randall Gonzalez appeals from the judgment and
sentence imposed for his Grant County conviction of unlawful imprisonment. His sole
contention is that recent caselaw requires striking of the $200 court-appointed attorney
fee that the court assessed as a legal financial obligation (LFO). We remand for the court
to strike the attorney fee.
In light of the limited issue raised, the facts leading to the conviction are
unimportant to the appeal. Mr. Gonzalez pleaded guilty to the unlawful imprisonment
charge in 2006. The court imposed a first time offender waiver and sentenced Mr.
Gonzalez to 51 days of confinement. The court imposed LFOs totaling $700, including a
$500 victim assessment and a $200 court-appointed attorney fee. Mr. Gonzalez did not
No. 36421-6-III
State v. Gonzalez
appeal the judgment and sentence until November 2, 2018. Our commissioner granted
Mr. Gonzalez’s motion to enlarge the time to file the notice of appeal on grounds he had
not been advised during the 2006 proceedings of his right to appeal from the judgment
and sentence. The trial court found Mr. Gonzalez indigent for purposes of this appeal.
Mr. Gonzalez’s sole contention is that the $200 court-appointed attorney fee must
be struck from his judgment and sentence based on State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426
P.3d 714 (2018). The State accepts and adopts the facts stated in Mr. Gonzalez’s brief,
but waives any argument on the issue.
The Washington Legislature in March 2018 enacted Engrossed Second Substitute
House Bill 1783 (H.B. 1783), which amended RCW 10.01.160(3) to prohibit the
imposition of discretionary costs on a defendant who was indigent at the time of
sentencing. LAWS OF 2018, ch. 269, § 6(3); Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d at 739. H.B. 1783 was
effective as of June 7, 2018, and applies prospectively to cases such as this that were not
final when the amendments were enacted. Id. at 738, 749.
The court-appointed attorney fee is a discretionary cost. See In re Pers. Restraint
of Dove, 196 Wn. App. 148, 155, 381 P.3d 1280 (2016). Because Mr. Gonzalez had
court appointed counsel below, we presume he was indigent when he was sentenced in
2006. The $200 court-appointed attorney fee should be struck pursuant to Ramirez.
2
No. 36421-6-III
State v. Gonzalez
Remanded.
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to
RCW 2.06.040.
lAwf"~(.t• ~W\,\..,
Lawrence-Berrey, C.J.
1 c.. ~ •
WE CONCUR:
Siddoway, J.
Pennell, J.
3