Case: 19-12307 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNTIED STATES COURT OF APEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 19-12307
Non-Argument Calendar
_____________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:19-cv-60350-BB
VILMA WALKER,
LORREN G. SOARES,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,
Solely as trustee for Harbor View Mortgage, Loan Trust Mortgage
Loan Pass-Through Certificate 2007-6,
BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA 17TH DISTRICT,
Defendants-Appellees.
_____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_____________________
(October 4, 2019)
Before WILSON, JORDAN, and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-12307 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 2 of 2
Vilma Walker and Lorren Soares sued Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company and Broward County, Florida, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking damages
for their eviction from a condominium located in Ft. Lauderdale. Their complaint
(and their amended complaint) alleged violations of their First, Fourth, Fifth, and
Fourteenth Amendment rights.
The district court, acting sua sponte, dismissed the case for lack of subject-
matter jurisdiction, and denied further leave to amend. Ms. Walker and Ms. Soares
now appeal.
We affirm. In their brief, Ms. Walker and Ms. Soares complain about the
conduct of Deutsche Bank but do not challenge the district court’s ruling on subject-
matter jurisdiction. As a result, they have abandoned any such challenge and
affirmance is in order. “While we read briefs filed by pro se litigants liberally, issues
not briefed on appeal by a pro se litigant are deemed abandoned.” Timson v.
Sampson, 518 F.3d 870, 874 (11th Cir. 2008) (citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
2