Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DAICEL CORPORATION, Appellant v. CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2018-2131 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00166. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ EUGENE PEREZ, Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by GERALD MYERS MURPHY, JR. CHARLES COLLINS-CHASE, Finnegan, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by C. COLLETTE CORSER, MICHAEL J. FLIBBERT; JUSTIN LEONARD KRIEGER, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Denver, CO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court